Digging further, Rives found that seven interview sessions cited in the footnotes of "Supreme Commander" could not have occurred - he says Eisenhower was either meeting with other people at the times indicated or actually travelling to another part of the country. First there was a letter from Ambrose - then a professor at Johns Hopkins University - that requested an interview with Eisenhower for a biography, a petition that contradicts Ambrose's frequent claim that Eisenhower's former executive assistant had contacted Ambrose to pen the president's life story after the assistant had read one of Ambrose's Civil War histories. Rives discovered the discrepancy as the Eisenhower library was preparing to mount an exhibition on Ambrose's relationship with Eisenhower.
"I personally would push it back to less than two or three." "I think five hours is a generous estimation of the actual time they spent together," Tim Rives, deputy director of the Eisenhower Presidential Library, told the British paper. Guardian reported over the weekend that it appears unlikely that Ambrose spent "hundreds and hundreds" of hours conducting interviews and research with Eisenhower's guidance as he worked on the project between 19, the year Eisenhower died. At a minimum, Ambrose's critics say, he had vastly exaggerated the amount of time he spent interviewing the former president and at worst, they suggest, he simply made up long stretches of the book. The author of "D-Day" and "Band of Brothers" died in 2002, but several authorities have recently questioned the writer's accounts of his research for "Supreme Commander," a massive two-volume biography of Dwight D. Was one of America's most revered popular historians fabricating his own material? That's the explosive charge now levied at Stephen Ambrose, author of numerous bestselling military and presidential histories.
0 kommentar(er)
